By John P. Herron
From the beginnings of business capitalism to modern disputes over evolution, nature has lengthy been a part of the general public debate over the social solid. As such, many ordinary scientists all through American background have understood their paintings as a cultural job contributing to social balance and their box as a robust instrument for boosting the standard of yank lifestyles. within the past due Victorian period, interwar interval, and post-war a long time, big social swap, fiscal cave in and restoration, and the aftermath of battle caused common scientists to supply up a civic-minded common technological know-how curious about the political wellbeing and fitness of yankee society. In technological know-how and the Social strong, John P. Herron explores the evolving inner and exterior forces influencing the layout and function of yankee normal technological know-how, via targeting 3 consultant scientists-geologist Clarence King, forester Robert Marshall, and biologist Rachel Carson-who purposefully thought of the social results in their paintings.
As cozy within the royal courts of Europe because the distant box camps of the yank West, Clarence King used to be the founding director of the U.S. Geological Survey, and used his status to combine technological know-how into past due 19th century political debates approximately international coverage, immigration, and social reform. within the mid-1930s, Robert Marshall based the environmental advocacy staff, The barren region Society, which reworked the face of normal upkeep in the US. devoted to social justice, Marshall combined wooded area ecology and pragmatic philosophy to craft a average technology ethic that prolonged the achieve of technology into political discussions concerning the restructuring of society brought on through urbanization and monetary trouble. Rachel Carson deservedly will get credits for launching the trendy environmental circulate along with her 1962 vintage Silent Spring. She made a new release of american citizens conscious of the social bills inherent within the human manipulation of the wildlife and used ordinary technology to critique demonstrated associations and provide an alternate imaginative and prescient of a fit and various society. As King, Marshall, and Carson turned more and more cautious of the social bills of industrialization, they used their clinical paintings to handle difficulties of ecological and social imbalance. whilst technological know-how turned professionalized and compartmentalized. those scientists labored to maintain technological know-how suitable to broader highbrow debates.
John Herron bargains a brand new tackle King, Marshall, and particularly Carson and their value that emphasizes the significance in their paintings to environmental, political, and cultural affairs, whereas illuminating the wider effect of traditional technology on American culture.
Read or Download Science and the Social Good: Nature, Culture, and Community, 1865-1965 PDF
Similar history & philosophy books
From the beginnings of business capitalism to modern disputes over evolution, nature has lengthy been a part of the general public debate over the social sturdy. As such, many normal scientists all through American background have understood their paintings as a cultural job contributing to social balance and their box as a strong device for boosting the standard of yank existence.
A part of a chain learning political strength and social idea, this quantity discusses issues equivalent to defence coverage and company development, worldwide markets, governance buildings and coverage techniques, and reflections on embedded autonomy.
Much of the evolutionary debate considering Darwin has fascinated with the extent at which usual choice happens. such a lot biologists recognize a number of degrees of selection—from the gene to the species. the talk approximately staff choice, notwithstanding, is the focal point of Mark E. Borrello’s Evolutionary Restraints. Tracing the background of organic makes an attempt to figure out even if choice ends up in the evolution of more fit teams, Borrello takes as his concentration the British naturalist V.
- A Source Book in Mathematics, 1200-1800
- The Astronomical Tables of Giovanni Bianchini
- Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science
- A History of Mathematics: From Antiquity to the Beginning of the Nineteenth Century
- Cognition and Recognition: On the Origin of Movement: Rademaker (1887-1957) (History of Science and Medicine Library)
- Essay on the Geography of Plants
Extra info for Science and the Social Good: Nature, Culture, and Community, 1865-1965
In his thinking, then, King infused the natural world with spiritual meaning. The wonders of nature were as much evidence of God’s handiwork as was scripture. His education suggested that the study of nature informed human history with a shared religious value system. When he classiﬁed minerals, cataloged insects, or studied glaciers, the force behind such science always remained God. Provincial debates involving the validity or veracity of new scientiﬁc theories mattered less than the recognition that it was “the intense divinity” of God that created the natural world.
They struck many as undigniﬁed and unethical. Darwin’s Origin of Species was as controversial for its materialism as it was for its discussion of natural selection. All species, Darwin argued, humans included, evolve, but they do so through chancedetermined processes. This way of thinking made King uneasy. His science was expansive, nationalistic, but, above all, morally instructive. He held an aversion to science that was pursued at the expense of other modes of 34 CLARENCE KING AND THE WESTERN LANDSCAPE knowing, but for King, less important than Darwin’s impact on religion was how his work threatened to separate natural science from purpose.
76 Few scientists questioned the belief that progress was inexorably bound to scientiﬁc advances, and by the time Lyell published his ﬁrst work, fewer still clung to a Mosaic time line for the history of the earth. All scientists, including the catastrophists, welcomed Lyell’s devotion to analytical methodology and his scientiﬁc mode of inquiry. The real debate was over the process of change on a global scale. Uniformitarians, as their name implies, supported a uniformity of law, process, and rate.